<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Internet SecuritT Group &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.securitt.com/cyber-security/internet-security-news/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.securitt.com</link>
	<description>Internet Security Consultant Services of West Virginia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:38:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trustwave admits issuing &#8216;man-in-the-middle&#8217; digital certificate</title>
		<link>http://www.securitt.com/trustwave-admits-issuing-man-in-the-middle-digital-certificate</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitt.com/trustwave-admits-issuing-man-in-the-middle-digital-certificate#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[admits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certificate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issuing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ManInTheMiddle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trustwave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitt.com/trustwave-admits-issuing-man-in-the-middle-digital-certificate</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Digital Certificate Authority (CA) Trustwave revealed that it has issued a digital certificate that enabled an unnamed private company to spy on SSL-protected connections within its corporate network, an action that prompted the Mozilla community to debate whether the CA&#8217;s root certificate should be removed from Firefox. View full post on Security &#8211; Infoworld]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--paging_filter-->
<p>Digital Certificate Authority (CA) Trustwave revealed that it has issued a digital certificate that enabled an unnamed private company to spy on SSL-protected connections within its corporate network, an action that prompted the Mozilla community to debate whether the CA&#8217;s root certificate should be removed from Firefox.</p>
<p>View full post on <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/d/security/trustwave-admits-issuing-man-in-the-middle-digital-certificate-185972?source=rss_security">Security &#8211; Infoworld</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitt.com/trustwave-admits-issuing-man-in-the-middle-digital-certificate/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ISC StormCast for Wednesday, February 8th 2012 http://isc.sans.edu/podcastdetail.html?id=2311, (Wed, Feb 8th)</title>
		<link>http://www.securitt.com/isc-stormcast-for-wednesday-february-8th-2012-httpisc-sans-edupodcastdetail-htmlid2311-wed-feb-8th</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitt.com/isc-stormcast-for-wednesday-february-8th-2012-httpisc-sans-edupodcastdetail-htmlid2311-wed-feb-8th#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[February]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http//isc.sans.edu/podcastdetail.htmlid=2311]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wednesday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitt.com/isc-stormcast-for-wednesday-february-8th-2012-httpisc-sans-edupodcastdetail-htmlid2311-wed-feb-8th</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(c) SANS Internet Storm Center. http://isc.sans.edu Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. View full post on SANS Internet Storm Center, InfoCON: green]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> (c) SANS Internet Storm Center. http://isc.sans.edu Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.</p>
<p>View full post on <a href="http://isc.sans.edu/podcastdetail.html?id=2311">      SANS Internet Storm Center, InfoCON: green</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitt.com/isc-stormcast-for-wednesday-february-8th-2012-httpisc-sans-edupodcastdetail-htmlid2311-wed-feb-8th/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More bogus ad-serving Android apps evade Google&apos;s Bouncer</title>
		<link>http://www.securitt.com/more-bogus-ad-serving-android-apps-evade-googles-bouncer</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitt.com/more-bogus-ad-serving-android-apps-evade-googles-bouncer#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adserving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bogus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bouncer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google&aposs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[More]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitt.com/more-bogus-ad-serving-android-apps-evade-googles-bouncer</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Users searching for games on the official Android Market have lately been heavily targeted by ad-pushing scammers. First it was the fake Temple Run app, and now a string of bogus copies of popular iPh&#8230; View full post on Help Net Security &#8211; News]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Users searching for games on the official Android Market have lately been heavily targeted by ad-pushing scammers. First it was the fake Temple Run app, and now a string of bogus copies of popular iPh&#8230;</p>
<p>View full post on <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/HelpNetSecurity/~3/H3ve-WXNBfo/secworld.php">Help Net Security &#8211; News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitt.com/more-bogus-ad-serving-android-apps-evade-googles-bouncer/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law Enforcement Ups Its Game In Cybercrime</title>
		<link>http://www.securitt.com/law-enforcement-ups-its-game-in-cybercrime</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitt.com/law-enforcement-ups-its-game-in-cybercrime#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybercrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[game]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitt.com/law-enforcement-ups-its-game-in-cybercrime</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New data from Trustwave SpiderLabs shows how law enforcement agencies worldwide are getting better at catching cybercriminals &#8212; but it&#8217;s still a major chase View full post on Dark Reading &#8211; All Stories]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New data from Trustwave SpiderLabs shows how law enforcement agencies worldwide are getting better at catching cybercriminals &#8212; but it&#8217;s still a major chase</p>
<p>View full post on <a href="http://www.darkreading.com/database-security/167901020/security/attacks-breaches/232600423/law-enforcement-ups-its-game-in-cybercrime.html">Dark Reading &#8211; All Stories</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitt.com/law-enforcement-ups-its-game-in-cybercrime/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heathrow facial recognition tech stalled by borders fiasco</title>
		<link>http://www.securitt.com/heathrow-facial-recognition-tech-stalled-by-borders-fiasco</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitt.com/heathrow-facial-recognition-tech-stalled-by-borders-fiasco#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiasco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heathrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stalled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TECH]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitt.com/heathrow-facial-recognition-tech-stalled-by-borders-fiasco</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Airport&#8217;s scanner rollout to miss Olympics target Heathrow airport may now not get facial recognition technology at all five of its terminals in time for the Olympics as planned, according to the Financial Times.… View full post on The Register &#8211; Security]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>Airport&#8217;s scanner rollout to miss Olympics target</h4>
<p>Heathrow airport may now not get facial recognition technology at all five of its terminals in time for the Olympics as planned, according to the <cite>Financial Times</cite>.…</p>
<p>View full post on <a href="http://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.co.uk/2012/02/08/facial_recognition_delay/">The Register &#8211; Security</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitt.com/heathrow-facial-recognition-tech-stalled-by-borders-fiasco/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fake Temple Run app found on Android Market</title>
		<link>http://www.securitt.com/fake-temple-run-app-found-on-android-market</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitt.com/fake-temple-run-app-found-on-android-market#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[found]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitt.com/fake-temple-run-app-found-on-android-market</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Android users who were looking forward to playing the popular Temple Run game &#8211; currently available only for iOS devices &#8211; have probably thought that the happy day has arrived when they discovered the&#8230; View full post on Help Net Security &#8211; News]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Android users who were looking forward to playing the popular Temple Run game &#8211; currently available only for iOS devices &#8211; have probably thought that the happy day has arrived when they discovered the&#8230;</p>
<p>View full post on <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/HelpNetSecurity/~3/YSfqSx_eK9g/secworld.php">Help Net Security &#8211; News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitt.com/fake-temple-run-app-found-on-android-market/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have Your Users&#8217; Passwords Already Been Hacked?</title>
		<link>http://www.securitt.com/have-your-users-passwords-already-been-hacked</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitt.com/have-your-users-passwords-already-been-hacked#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[already]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[been]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Users&#8217]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitt.com/have-your-users-passwords-already-been-hacked</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If employees use their same password at work and in their personal lives, another company&#8217;s breach may weaken your own security. Five steps to mitigate the risk. View full post on Dark Reading &#8211; All Stories]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If employees use their same password at work and in their personal lives, another company&#8217;s breach may weaken your own security. Five steps to mitigate the risk.</p>
<p>View full post on <a href="http://www.darkreading.com/insider-threat/167801100/security/security-management/232600431/have-your-users-8217-passwords-already-been-hacked.html">Dark Reading &#8211; All Stories</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitt.com/have-your-users-passwords-already-been-hacked/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security lab: Something fishy about Google Chrome&#8217;s Safe Browsing API</title>
		<link>http://www.securitt.com/security-lab-something-fishy-about-google-chromes-safe-browsing-api</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitt.com/security-lab-something-fishy-about-google-chromes-safe-browsing-api#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[about]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browsing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fishy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[something]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitt.com/security-lab-something-fishy-about-google-chromes-safe-browsing-api</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the start, Google&#8217;s Safe Browsing API was designed to spot malicious Web pages so users wouldn&#8217;t get trapped in them. Google identifies these sites through its own algorithms and user notification. View full post on Security &#8211; Infoworld]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--paging_filter-->
<p>From the start, Google&#8217;s Safe Browsing API was designed to spot malicious Web pages so users wouldn&#8217;t get trapped in them. Google identifies these sites through its own algorithms and user notification.</p>
<p>View full post on <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/d/security/security-lab-something-fishy-about-google-chromes-safe-browsing-api-185893?source=rss_security">Security &#8211; Infoworld</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitt.com/security-lab-something-fishy-about-google-chromes-safe-browsing-api/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chrome to stop checking Certificate Revocation List (CRL)?, (Wed, Feb 8th)</title>
		<link>http://www.securitt.com/chrome-to-stop-checking-certificate-revocation-list-crl-wed-feb-8th</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitt.com/chrome-to-stop-checking-certificate-revocation-list-crl-wed-feb-8th#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certificate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[checking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitt.com/chrome-to-stop-checking-certificate-revocation-list-crl-wed-feb-8th</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a post on Ars Technica yesterday, that led back to another blog post from Sunday that suggests that Google Chrome will stop doing CRLchecks at some point in the not too distant future. This has led to some interesting debate because the CRLmechanism has largely been ineffective. For a public key infrastructure (PKI) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a post on Ars Technica yesterday, that led back to another blog post from Sunday that suggests that Google Chrome will stop doing CRLchecks at some point in the not too distant future. This has led to some interesting debate because the CRLmechanism has largely been ineffective. For a public key infrastructure (PKI) such as HTTPS to work, there must be an effective way of verifying the validity of the certificates. Due to the number of Certificate Authority (CA) breaches in recent years we&#8217;d all like a fast and effective method of taking compromised certificates out of play. During the highest profile breaches, all the major browser vendors simply pushed new versions of the browser with the root certificates from the breached CAs removed, in part because the browsers by design fail open (allow the connection)if they are unable to verify the certificate. So, is this a big deal? Is it the right way to go? Is it time to rethink/redesign/replace SSLor HTTPS? What do you think?<br />
References<br />
http://arstechnica.com/business/guides/2012/02/google-strips-chrome-of-ssl-revocation-checking.ars<br />
http://www.imperialviolet.org/2012/02/05/crlsets.html<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Jim Clausing, GIAC GSE #26</p>
<p>jclausing &#8211;at&#8211; isc [dot] sans (dot) edu</p>
<p> (c) SANS Internet Storm Center. http://isc.sans.edu Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.</p>
<p>View full post on <a href="http://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?storyid=12556&#038;rss">      SANS Internet Storm Center, InfoCON: green</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitt.com/chrome-to-stop-checking-certificate-revocation-list-crl-wed-feb-8th/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Explorer dominates browser security as Google faces accusations</title>
		<link>http://www.securitt.com/internet-explorer-dominates-browser-security-as-google-faces-accusations</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitt.com/internet-explorer-dominates-browser-security-as-google-faces-accusations#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accusations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dominates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitt.com/internet-explorer-dominates-browser-security-as-google-faces-accusations</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Internet Explorer 9 should be the go-to browser for organizations concerned about protecting machines from malicious downloads, according to a new study from NSS Labs: Microsoft&#8217;s browser trounced rivals Chrome, Firefox, and Saf View full post on Security &#8211; Infoworld]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 8px; background: none no-repeat scroll center top #ffffff; position: relative; float: right; width: 243px; height: 182px;"><img src="http://www.securitt.com/wp-content/uploads/HLIC/7a70626210a1bb5f1fba3fc4c93196f7.jpg" alt="Internet Explorer dominates browser security as Google faces accusations" width="243" height="182" align="right" /></div>
<p>Internet Explorer 9 should be the go-to browser for organizations concerned about protecting machines from malicious downloads, according to a new study from NSS Labs: Microsoft&#8217;s browser trounced rivals Chrome, Firefox, and Saf</p>
<p>View full post on <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/t/anti-spyware/internet-explorer-dominates-browser-security-google-faces-accusations-185938?source=rss_security">Security &#8211; Infoworld</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitt.com/internet-explorer-dominates-browser-security-as-google-faces-accusations/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.941 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-08 10:38:15 -->

